Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Reticulocyte counting using the Sysmex RAM-1 was evaluated. The results of 113 samples analysed on the Sysmex RAM-1 were compared with those from both flow cytometry (FCM) and a manual technique. Reticulocyte counting with the Sysmex RAM-1 showed excellent precision, with an overall coefficient of variance (CV) less than 5%, and almost no carry-over. Reticulocyte counts were stable after blood storage for 48 h at 4 degrees C and room temperature (RT). Linearity was demonstrated very well for Sysmex RAM-1 and FCM (rRAM=0.9998, rFCM=0.9974, P < 0.001) when reticulocyte counts were 5 x 109/l-480 x 109/l. Comparisons of methods showed a good relation for reticulocyte counts between Sysmex RAM-1 and manual counting (r=0.9760), FCM and manual counting (r=0.9623), and Sysmex RAM-1 and FCM (r=0.9527). Analysis of receiver operating characteristic curves showed that the true-positive rate (TPR) was 0.95 for Sysmex RAM-1, and 0.83 for FCM; the area under curve was 0.999 and 0.972 for Sysmex RAM-1, 0.990 and 0.900 for FCM. These findings confirm that Sysmex RAM-1 can make counting reticulocytes easier, more accurate and more reproducible.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Peng et al. (2001) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: