Key result
Intradialytic glucose-insulin infusion had no additional hemodynamic effects compared to standard hemodialysis, whereas combined hemodialysis and meal intake reduced systolic blood pressure by 22%.
Why the study?
Intradialytic nutrition may improve nutritional status and reduce mortality in maintenance hemodialysis patients, but has been linked to hemodynamic instability, leading some centers to restrict intradialytic meals.
Does intradialytic glucose-insulin infusion or meal intake worsen hemodynamic instability in nondiabetic patients on maintenance hemodialysis?
Does intradialytic glucose-insulin infusion or meal intake worsen hemodynamic instability in nondiabetic patients on maintenance hemodialysis?
Hemodialysis itself is the primary driver of intradialytic hemodynamic changes, though the addition of meals may further exacerbate blood pressure reductions compared to glucose-insulin infusion.
Meal intake during hemodialysis may exacerbate hypotension; leaves open effects of glucose-insulin infusion in nondiabetic patients.
INTRODUCTION: Intradialytic nutrition may improve nutritional status and reduce mortality in patients on maintenance hemodialysis (HD) but has been associated with adverse events, mainly hemodynamic instability. Some dialysis centers therefore restrict intradialytic meals. In 2 clinical studies, we investigated the effects of intradialytic glucose-insulin infusion (GII) and meal intake on blood pressure (BP), pulse wave velocity (PWV), pulse wave analysis (PWA), and cardiac output (CO). PWA yielded augmentation index standardized with heart rate 75 (AIx@HR75). METHODS: In the GII study, 12 nondiabetic HD patients had BP, PWV, PWA, and CO measured during 3 HD sessions: standard HD, HD with glucose infusion, and HD with GII. In the Meal study, 12 nondiabetic patients had BP and PWA measured on 3 study days: meal alone (non-HD), meal and HD, 2 meals and HD. Twelve matched healthy controls completed the non-HD day. FINDINGS: In the GII study, glucose or GII had no additional effects on hemodynamic parameters compared with standard HD. HD resulted in a decrease in systolic BP of 13%, in diastolic BP of 9%, in AIx@HR75 of 17%, and CO of 18%. PWV was reduced by only 5%. In the Meal study, a meal alone did not change BP, whereas the combined influence of HD and meal intake reduced systolic BP with 22% and diastolic BP with 19%. Furthermore, AIx@HR75 decreased by 37% on HD days and by 36% in controls, but was unaffected on non-HD days. DISCUSSION: In the GII study, HD significantly reduced BP, AIx@75, and CO, whereas PWV remained almost constant. No additional effects were observed by concomitant GII during HD. BP reductions seemed larger in the Meal study compared with the GII study. Taken together, HD per se appears as the main discriminant for intradialytic hypotension but in hemodynamically unstable patients the timing and route of nutrition provision should be considered carefully.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Svinth-Johansen et al. (2020) studied Maintenance hemodialysis (n=36). Glucose-insulin infusion (GII) and meal intake vs. Standard hemodialysis or meal alone was evaluated on Hemodynamic parameters including blood pressure, pulse wave velocity, augmentation index, and cardiac output. Intradialytic glucose-insulin infusion had no additional hemodynamic effects compared to standard hemodialysis, whereas combined hemodialysis and meal intake reduced systolic blood pressure by 22%.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: