Key result
Bispectral index was more accurate than response entropy in predicting loss of consciousness during sevoflurane anesthesia (MD 0.06, 95% CI 0.02-0.09, p=0.009), with the benefit primarily observed in adults.
Why the study?
Bispectral index (BIS) and response entropy (RE) monitor anesthesia depth, but published data comparing their accuracy in detecting consciousness transitions during sevoflurane anesthesia needed synthesis.
Does bispectral index (BIS) improve the accuracy of predicting the transition of consciousness compared to response entropy (RE) in patients undergoing sevoflurane anesthesia?
Meta-Analysis (n=248)
Does bispectral index (BIS) improve the accuracy of predicting the transition of consciousness compared to response entropy (RE) in patients undergoing sevoflurane anesthesia?
Mean Difference: 0.06 (95% CI 0.02–0.09)
p-value: p=0.009
Bispectral index (BIS) is more accurate than response entropy (RE) in predicting loss of consciousness during sevoflurane anesthesia in adults, though results are limited by high study heterogeneity.
Clinicians may prefer BIS over response entropy for sevoflurane induction monitoring in adults; extends accuracy data but heterogeneity limits certainty.
Background: Bispectral index (BIS) and response entropy (RE) are used to monitor the depth of anesthesia. Objectives: To collect published data and compare the accuracy of BIS and RE in detecting the transition of consciousness during sevoflurane anesthesia. Data sources: Studies indexed in the PubMed, Embase, or Cochrane databases. Study eligibility criteria: Participants: Patients who need to use BIS and RE to monitor sevoflurane anesthesia depth simultaneously. Interventions: A random-effects model was fitted using RevMan 5.3. Subgroup analyses were performed on patient age. The Cochrane I 2 methodology was used to determine the heterogeneity of the statistical results, while GRADE Pro served to assess the quality of evidence. Results: Overall, 195 articles were identified, of which 7 were finally included. The meta-analysis results showed that BIS is more accurate than RE in predicting loss of consciousness (LOC) during sevoflurane anesthesia (MD, .06; 95% confidence interval [CI], .02–.09; P = .009; I 2 = 92%). In contrast, there was no significant difference between BIS and RE for recovery of consciousness (ROC; MD, .01; 95% CI, .00–.02; P = .79; I 2 = 83%). Subgroup analyses revealed no significant differences in LOC (MD, .02; 95% CI, .01–.05; P = .13; I 2 = 60%) and ROC (MD, −.01; 95% CI, −.06–.04; P = .58; I 2 = 95%) in children. However, the results in adults demonstrated that BIS is more accurate than RE in predicting LOC (MD, −.07; 95% CI, .05–.10; P = .002; I 2 = 76%). Limitations: First, this meta-analysis was affected by a large study heterogeneity. Second, this analysis only included publications in English, therefore, some studies may have been omitted. Conclusion: BIS is more accurate than RE in predicting LOC during sevoflurane anesthesia in adults. However, no significant differences were identified in children. Registration number (PROSPERO): CRD42020163119
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liang et al. (2021) conducted a meta-analysis in Sevoflurane anesthesia (n=248). Bispectral index (BIS) vs. Response entropy (RE) was evaluated on Prediction probability value (PK) for loss of consciousness (LOC) (MD 0.06, 95% CI 0.02-0.09, p=0.009). Bispectral index was more accurate than response entropy in predicting loss of consciousness during sevoflurane anesthesia (MD 0.06, 95% CI 0.02-0.09, p=0.009), with the benefit primarily observed in adults.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: