Key result
A novel body size index [h+(h-BSA)] revealed that total heart volume was larger than expected for body weight gain in subjects with high cardiovascular risk features compared to low-risk subjects.
Why the study?
Common body surface area correction may hide differences in heart size related to cardiovascular disease, motivating a novel body size indexing measure to quantify total heart volume.
Does a novel body size indexing measure [h+(h-BSA)] improve the assessment of total heart volume compared to common BSA correction in patients undergoing cardiac CT?
Observational (n=2,305)
No
Does a novel body size indexing measure [h+(h-BSA)] improve the assessment of total heart volume compared to common BSA correction in patients undergoing cardiac CT?
A novel body size index [h+(h-BSA)] may better distinguish pathological heart enlargement from obesity-related changes compared to standard BSA correction.
Novel THV index merits prospective validation in CAC cohorts; leaves open superiority over standard indices and any clinical role.
Background: This single-center retrospective observational study reviewed data from 2305 persons examined for coronary artery calcium (CAC) with non-contrast-enhanced cardiac CT. Other cardiac structures, including chamber volumes, were evaluated besides the CAC scoring. We proposed a novel body size indexing measure that may outperform common indices for quantifying total heart volume (THV). Methods: This index is the sum of height and the difference between height (unitless) and body surface area (unitless), [h+(h-BSA)], and if the (h-BSA) equals “zero”, it is a feature of the “standard human”. Results: We found that, in subjects with a low cardiovascular (CV) risk, the THV normalized for the novel index was simply a function of BW gain, being the highest in obese. If high-CV-risk features (hypertension, diabetes) were present, the measured THV was larger than expected for BW gain, exceeding values observed in low-CV-risk ones. Differences were found to be sex-independent in all BMI categories. Conclusions: Common BSA correction hides these differences and makes the prognostication of CV risk error-introducing. The indexation we proposed might help distinguish the effects of body weight gain from the ones resulting from the presence of certain cardiovascular diseases.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sosnowski et al. (2025) conducted an observational in Coronary artery calcium assessment (n=2,305). Novel body size indexing measure [h+(h-BSA)] vs. Common BSA correction was evaluated on Total heart volume (THV). A novel body size index [h+(h-BSA)] revealed that total heart volume was larger than expected for body weight gain in subjects with high cardiovascular risk features compared to low-risk subjects.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: