Key result
The proposed hybrid analytical methods for quantifying valsartan and sacubitril demonstrated excellent whiteness ranks and high sustainability compared to reported methods.
The proposed analytical methods for quantifying valsartan and sacubitril offer high sustainability and greenness, encouraging industrial application in developing countries.
May support sustainable valsartan/sacubitril quantification in resource-limited settings; leaves open routine lab adoption and regulatory validation.
for the first and second methods, respectively. The green profile of the proposed methods was confirmed using the analytical eco-scale (AES), green analytical procedure index (GAPI), and analytical greenness metric (AGREE) tools. The proposed hybrid methods proved highly sustainable through the whiteness RGB 12 algorithm evaluation approach. Whiteness was comparatively assessed for the proposed and reported methods based on relative scoring depending on the parameters of each method. Despite this scoring approach being accurate as a relative score for comparative purposes, it gave rise to underestimated absolute scores. Therefore, to obtain a proper conclusion from the comparative whiteness study, all the methods were ranked according to their whiteness score, illustrating the excellent whiteness ranks of the proposed methods. Upon complete comparison with the reported methods, the suggested ones showed several advantages concerning analytical performance and the greenness level. The proven affordability and simplicity encourage their wide industrial application in developing countries.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kammoun et al. (2024) studied this question. Analytical methods for concurrent quantification of valsartan and sacubitril vs. Reported methods was evaluated on Whiteness score and green profile. The proposed hybrid analytical methods for quantifying valsartan and sacubitril demonstrated excellent whiteness ranks and high sustainability compared to reported methods.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: