Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Movement of extracellular Ca2+ is required for the sustained increase in [Ca2+]i necessary for T cell activation. However, the mechanisms mediating mitogen-stimulated Ca2+ movement into T cells have not been completely delineated. To explore the possibility that a Na(+)-dependent Ca2+ (Na+/Ca2+) exchanger might play a role in the mitogen-induced increases in [Ca2+]i required for T cell activation, the effects of inhibitors of this exchanger were examined. Inhibitors of Na+/Ca2+ exchange suppressed the sustained increase in [Ca2+]i stimulated by ligation of the CD3-TCR complex, but did not affect mobilization of intracellular Ca2+ stores. Consistent with the importance of this prolonged increase in [Ca2+]i in T cell activation, Na+/Ca2+ exchange inhibitors, but not inhibitors of the Na+/H+ antiporter, inhibited DNA synthesis stimulated by immobilized anti-CD3 mAb. Inhibition only occurred when the agents were present during the first hours after stimulation. These agents also inhibited IL-2 production, but not expression of the IL-2R or of an early activation Ag, 4F2. Inhibition of IL-2 production did not account for the inhibition of T cell proliferation as addition of exogenous IL-2 or phorbol ester (PDB) did not overcome the inhibition. In contrast, activation pathways that are not thought to require an increase in [Ca2+]i such as IL-1 + PDB or engagement of CD28 in the presence of PDB were less sensitive to the suppressive effects of inhibitors of Na+/Ca2+ exchange. Thus, proliferation induced by these stimuli was not suppressed by low concentrations of these inhibitors and IL-2 production induced by mAb to CD28 + PDB was not inhibited by any concentration of inhibitors of Na+/Ca2+ exchange. These results suggest that stimulation of a Ca2+ transporter with the same spectrum of inhibition as the Na+/Ca2+ exchanger in other tissues mediates the sustained increase in [Ca2+]i required for T cell activation after CD3 ligation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wacholtz et al. (1992) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: