Key result
Sacubitril/valsartan reduced proteinuria by 47% and was more effective than valsartan monotherapy in improving renal ultrastructure and tubular injury in a rat model of early diabetic nephropathy.
Why the study?
To examine whether sacubitril/valsartan suppresses renal injury in a pre-clinical model of early diabetic nephropathy more effectively than valsartan monotherapy.
Does sacubitril/valsartan reduce renal injury more effectively than valsartan monotherapy in a rat model of early diabetic nephropathy?
Does sacubitril/valsartan reduce renal injury more effectively than valsartan monotherapy in a rat model of early diabetic nephropathy?
Effect estimate: -47%
Absolute Event Rate: 8.9% vs 16.7%
p-value: p=<0.05
In a rat model of early diabetic nephropathy, sacubitril/valsartan provided greater renoprotection, including reduced proteinuria and improved renal ultrastructure, compared to valsartan monotherapy.
Hypothesis-generating for sacubitril/valsartan in diabetic nephropathy; human trials needed before clinical consideration.
OBJECTIVE: Diabetic nephropathy (DN) is characterized by glomerular and tubulointerstitial injury, proteinuria and remodeling. Here we examined whether the combination of an inhibitor of neprilysin (sacubitril), a natriuretic peptide-degrading enzyme, and an angiotensin II type 1 receptor blocker (valsartan), suppresses renal injury in a pre-clinical model of early DN more effectively than valsartan monotherapy. METHODS: , ZOH). Six Zucker Lean (ZL) rats received saline (Group 5) and served as lean controls (ZLC). Drugs were administered daily for 10 weeks by oral gavage. RESULTS: R expression, glomerular and tubular nitroso-oxidative stress, with associated increases in urinary markers of tubular injury. None of the drugs reduced fasting glucose or HbA1c. Hypercholesterolemia was reduced in ZOSV (- 43%) and ZOV (- 34%) (p < 0.05), but not in ZOH (- 13%) (ZOSV > ZOV > ZOH). Proteinuria was ameliorated in ZOSV (- 47%; p < 0.05) and ZOV (- 30%; p > 0.05), but was exacerbated in ZOH (+ 28%; p > 0.05) (ZOSV > ZOV > ZOH). Compared to ZOC, hyperfiltration was improved in ZOSV (p < 0.05 vs ZOC), but not in ZOV or ZOH. None of the drugs improved RRI. Mesangial expansion was reduced by all 3 treatments (ZOV > ZOSV > ZOH). Importantly, sac/val was more effective in improving podocyte and tubular mitochondrial ultrastructure than val or hydralazine (ZOSV > ZOV > ZOH) and this was associated with increases in nephrin and podocin gene expression in ZOSV (p < 0.05), but not ZOV or ZOH. Periarterial and tubulointerstitial fibrosis and nitroso-oxidative stress were reduced in all 3 treatment groups to a similar extent. Of the eight urinary proximal tubule cell injury markers examined, five were elevated in ZOC (p < 0.05). Clusterin and KIM-1 were reduced in ZOSV (p < 0.05), clusterin alone was reduced in ZOV and no markers were reduced in ZOH (ZOSV > ZOV > ZOH). CONCLUSIONS: Compared to val monotherapy, sac/val was more effective in reducing proteinuria, renal ultrastructure and tubular injury in a clinically relevant animal model of early DN. More importantly, these renoprotective effects were independent of improvements in blood pressure, glycemia and nitroso-oxidative stress. These novel findings warrant future clinical investigations designed to test whether sac/val may offer renoprotection in the setting of DN.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Habibi et al. (2019) studied Diabetic nephropathy (n=70). Sacubitril/valsartan vs. Valsartan, hydralazine, or saline was evaluated on Proteinuria (urine protein to creatinine ratio) (-47%, p=<0.05). Sacubitril/valsartan reduced proteinuria by 47% and was more effective than valsartan monotherapy in improving renal ultrastructure and tubular injury in a rat model of early diabetic nephropathy.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: