Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Background/Objectives: The use of vaginal mesh for pelvic organ prolapse (POP) repair remains controversial following global restrictions due to safety concerns. This study evaluated intra- and perioperative morbidity following a standardized single-incision, six-point fixation approach using an ultralight vaginal mesh in primary surgery for anterior/central POP. Methods: We conducted a retrospective multicenter study including 426 women who underwent primary POP repair with the InGYNious mesh system between May 2016 and February 2024. All surgeries followed a uniform technique across seven Italian centers. Data were collected on perioperative complications, urinary function, postoperative pain, and catheter duration. Results: The overall morbidity rate was 7.3% (31/426), primarily due to hematomas (4.5%), bladder injuries (1.4%), and ureteral injuries (0.7%). Median surgery duration was 40 min with minimal blood loss. Early postoperative pain was associated with higher POP-Q scores, longer surgical duration, and lower BMI. No cases of de novo urinary incontinence or urinary tract infection were reported in the perioperative period. Conclusions: This large multicenter case series suggests that, in experienced hands, this standardized vaginal mesh approach is associated with a low perioperative complication rate. However, the absence of a control group and the short follow-up are major limitations. Long-term outcome data, particularly regarding mesh-related complications, are essential before drawing firm conclusions on the broader safety or role of vaginal mesh in POP repair.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Deltetto et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: