Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Fetal IGF-I is a determinant of birth weight, but whether maternal IGF-I plays a significant role is controversial. We sought to examine the relationships among maternal IGF-I, IGF-binding protein (IGFBP)-1, and IGFBP-2, with maternal and newborn anthropometry, in a cohort of 325 nondiabetic pregnant women of African origin. Blood was collected for IGF-I, IGFBP-1, and IGFBP-2 at 9, 25, and 35 wk gestation and in cord blood at delivery. In the second and third trimesters, maternal IGF-I was significantly correlated (P < 0.005) with maternal body mass index and triceps skinfold thickness. Maternal IGFBP-1 and -2 had an inverse correlation (P < 0.0001), with maternal anthropometry. Maternal IGF-I at 35 wk, and fetal IGF-I by cord blood were significantly correlated with birth weight (P = 0.001 and 0.048, respectively). IGFBP-1 in the third trimester and cord blood were negatively correlated with birth weight (P = 0.012 and 0.002). In multiple regression analyses, maternal IGF-I at 35 wk, fetal IGF-I, maternal weight at the first antenatal visit, gender, and gestational age were significant independent factors in the determination of birth weight. In conclusion, maternal IGF-I levels, especially during late pregnancy, positively influence birth weight.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Boyne et al. (2003) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: