Key result
Antiepileptic drug prophylaxis prescribing in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage appeared arbitrary and was not significantly predicted by female gender (OR 3.05) or other clinical factors, whereas midline shift independently predicted actual seizure activity.
Why the study?
Controversy exists regarding antiepileptic drug prophylaxis prescribing in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage, prompting an evaluation of factors associated with prescribing practices.
What clinical and radiological factors are associated with the prescribing of antiepileptic drug prophylaxis and the development of seizures in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage?
Cohort (n=68)
No
What clinical and radiological factors are associated with the prescribing of antiepileptic drug prophylaxis and the development of seizures in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage?
Odds Ratio: 3.05 (95% CI 0.94–9.92)
Absolute Event Rate: 41% vs 17.2%
p-value: p=0.064
In patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage, midline shift independently predicts seizure activity, yet antiepileptic drug prophylaxis prescribing patterns appear arbitrary and are not guided by this or other identifiable clinical risk factors.
Current prophylaxis prescribing in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage should not yet follow observational predictors; this leaves open randomized evaluation of risk-stratified approaches.
INTRODUCTION: Controversy exists in antiepileptic drug (AED) prophylaxis prescribing in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH). We undertook the Use of Antiepileptic Drugs in Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage (ALIBI) study to identify factors associated with prescribing practices. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of all consecutive patients requiring Level 1 care with aneurysmal SAH admitted between 2012 and 2014 to the intensive care unit at Toronto Western Hospital, Ontario, Canada, was conducted. Data were collected on clinical and imaging characteristics. Primary and secondary outcomes were AED prophylaxis and clinical seizure activity during hospitalization. Data were compared using chi-square or Mann-Whitney U-tests. Those variables found to be significant, or trending toward significance, on univariate analysis were fitted to multivariate regression. RESULTS: Sixty-eight patients were included. Mean age was 62 ± 12.2, and 42.6% of patients were male. Of these, 21 patients (30.9%) received AED prophylactically, while 18 (26.5%) had reported seizures at some point during hospitalization. Female gender and presence of midline shift (MLS) were significantly associated or approached significance with AED prophylaxis in univariate analysis (p = 0.036 and p = 0.062, respectively). In multivariate analysis, only MLS was an independent predictor (odds ratio 5.09, p = 0.04). CONCLUSION: The presence of MLS was an independent predictor of seizure activity in patients with aneurysmal SAH. AED prophylaxis prescribing patterns seemed arbitrary and was not informed by identifiable clinical factors or true risk factors for seizure. A current lack of evidence guiding AED prescribing practice highlights the need for larger studies in this patient population.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dmytriw et al. (2019) conducted a cohort in Aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (n=68). Female gender vs. Male gender was evaluated on Antiepileptic drug (AED) prophylaxis initiation (OR 3.05, 95% CI 0.94-9.92, p=0.064). Antiepileptic drug prophylaxis prescribing in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage appeared arbitrary and was not significantly predicted by female gender (OR 3.05) or other clinical factors, whereas midline shift independently predicted actual seizure activity.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: