Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Background In many African countries, clinical samples are not routinely tested for carbapenem-resistant bacteria, the resistance data remaining limited. Material and methods In March 2020 –June 2022, we collected extended spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) -producing Enterobacterales (ESBL-PE) isolates from five hospitals in Burkina Faso. The species were identified using API20E and ESBL production confirmed by double-disc synergy test. Production of carbapenemases and AmpC-β-lactamases and phenotypic co-resistance were determined. Results Among the 473 ESBL-PE, 356 were ESBL- E. coli (ESBL-Ec) and 117 Klebsiella spp. (ESBL-K). Of the isolates, 5.3% were carbapenemase and 5.3% AmpC-β-lactamase positive Three types of carbapenemases were identified: 19 NDM, 3 OXA-48 like and 1 VIM. Two isolates produced both NDM and OXA48-like carbapenemases. Carbapenemase rates were highest among isolates in tertiary hospitals. Co-resistance rates were up to 85% for aminoglycosides, 90% for sulfonamides, 95% for fluoroquinolones and 25% for chloramphenicol, Fosfomycin resistance was 6% for ESBL-Ec and 49% for ESBL-K (49%). Conclusion Many ESBL-Ec and ESBL-K co-produced carbapenemases and/or AmpC-β-lactamases, at all healthcare levels and in various samples, with high co-resistance rates to non-betalactams. Carbapenem resistance is no longer rare, calling for testing in routine diagnostics, vigorous resistance surveillance system, and infection control within healthcare.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Garba et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: