Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Objective The aim of this study was to evaluate the value of three-dimensional (3D) power Doppler ultrasonography in differentiating between adenomyosis and uterine leiomyoma. Design This was a cross-sectional study. Setting The study was conducted in Kasr El-Ainy Hospital. Patients and methods This study was conducted on 60 patients between 20 and 60 years of age, who were previously diagnosed on 2D ultrasonography as having adenomyosis and/or leiomyoma. 3D power Doppler ultrasound was performed before surgery (myomectomy or hysterectomy). The examination evaluated vascular location (location), vascular index, flow index, and vascular-flow index. Postoperative histopathological examination was carried out to confirm the diagnosis. Results Patients with uterine leiomyoma had significantly higher vascular index (P=0.005), flow index (P<0.01), and vascular-flow index (P=0.004) levels than did patients with adenomyosis. A significant difference in vascular location was also noted between cases of uterine leiomyoma and adenomyosis (P≤0.001). Conclusion 3D power Doppler ultrasonography could be used to more effectively differentiate between uterine adenomyosis and leiomyoma.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
ElGhamry et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: