Key result
Priming exercise did not alter phase II Vo2 tau (20 vs 22 s, P=0.30) but accelerated the overall Vo2 response time constant (36 vs 43 s, P=0.002) in 9- to 13-year-old boys.
Why the study?
Does priming exercise alter oxygen uptake kinetics and cardiac output during subsequent very heavy-intensity exercise in young boys?
Does priming exercise alter oxygen uptake kinetics and cardiac output during subsequent very heavy-intensity exercise in young boys?
Absolute Event Rate: 20% vs 22%
p-value: p=0.30
Priming exercise in young boys accelerates overall oxygen uptake kinetics by increasing total phase II amplitude and reducing the slow component, suggesting sensitivity to oxygen delivery.
Priming warrants no change to pediatric exercise protocols; leaves open performance benefits and mechanisms in larger youth cohorts.
The present study examined the effect of priming exercise on O(2) uptake (Vo(2)) kinetics during subsequent very heavy exercise in eight 9- to 13-yr-old boys. We hypothesised that priming exercise would 1) elevate muscle O(2) delivery prior to the subsequent bout of very heavy exercise, 2) have no effect on the phase II Vo(2) tau, 3) elevate the phase II Vo(2) total amplitude, and 4) reduce the magnitude of the Vo(2) slow component. Each participant completed repeat 6-min bouts of very heavy-intensity cycling exercise separated by 6 min of light pedaling. During the tests Vo(2), muscle oxygenation (near infrared spectroscopy), and cardiac output (Q) (thoracic impedance) were determined. Priming exercise increased baseline muscle oxygenation and elevated Q at baseline and throughout the second exercise bout. The phase II Vo(2) tau was not altered by priming exercise (bout 1: 22 + or - 7 s vs. bout 2: 20 + or - 4 s; P = 0.30). However, the time constant describing the entire Vo(2) response from start to end of exercise was accelerated (bout 1: 43 + or - 8 s vs. bout 2: 36 + or - 5 s; P = 0.002) due to an increased total phase II Vo(2) amplitude (bout 1: 1.73 + or - 0.33 l/min vs. bout 2: 1.80 + or - 0.59 l/min; P = 0.002) and a reduced Vo(2) slow component amplitude (bout 1: 0.18 + or - 0.08 l/min vs. bout 2: 0.12 + or - 0.09 l/min; P = 0.048). These results suggest that phase II Vo(2) kinetics in young boys is principally limited by intrinsic muscle metabolic factors, whereas the Vo(2) total phase II and slow component amplitudes may be O(2) delivery sensitive.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Barker et al. (2010) studied this question. Priming exercise vs. Unprimed exercise (bout 1) was evaluated on Phase II Vo(2) tau (p=0.30). Priming exercise did not alter phase II Vo2 tau (20 vs 22 s, P=0.30) but accelerated the overall Vo2 response time constant (36 vs 43 s, P=0.002) in 9- to 13-year-old boys.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: