The dc electric-field dependence of the relative dielectric constant εᵣ(E) in polar dielectrics is studied. The Landau-Ginzburg-Devonshire (LGD) theory and its approximate treatments in dealing with εᵣ(E) are reviewed. It is found that the LGD theory works well in the case of a single polarization mechanism existing in the dielectrics, and the Johnson relation εᵣ(E)=εᵣ(0)/1+λ[ε₀εᵣ(0)]³E²1/3 is a reasonable approximate expression describing εᵣ(E). Many polar dielectrics, however, exhibit more than one polarization mechanism contributing to the total dielectric constant. The dielectric response of such polar dielectrics under an external dc electric field cannot be purely described by LGD theory. In this work, we introduce a ``reorientational polarization'' to describe the ``extrinsic'' contribution to the dielectric constant, such as might arise from polar clusters, domain-wall motions, fluctuation of microcluster boundaries, defects, etc. A ``multipolarization-mechanism'' model is proposed, and a combined equation ${{ε}}ᵣ(E)={{ε}}ᵣ(0)/{1+{λ}[{{ε}}₀{{ε}}ᵣ(0){]}³{E}²{}}1/3+{Σ}{(P}₀x/{{ε}}₀)[cosh(Ex){]}^{{-}2}$ is adopted to describe the total ${{ε}}ᵣ(E)$ response of a polar dielectric, where the first term is Johnson's relation which represents the ``intrinsic'' polarization, and the latter represents the ``extrinsic'' polarization. Agreement between the fitting of this equation to the experimental data is obtained for paraelectrics KTaO₃ and Bi:SrTiO₃.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhi Yu (2004) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: