Key result
An age-adjusted D-dimer threshold yielded 96.75% sensitivity and 87.02% specificity in outpatients, while a threshold of at least 2 × ULN performed best for inpatients.
Why the study?
To explore the appropriate D-dimer cutoff using the immunoturbidimetric method in outpatients and inpatients with suspected acute pulmonary embolism.
What are the optimal D-dimer thresholds for ruling out acute pulmonary embolism in outpatients versus inpatients?
Observational (n=2,689)
What are the optimal D-dimer thresholds for ruling out acute pulmonary embolism in outpatients versus inpatients?
Number Needed to Treat: 1.18
Number Needed to Treat: 1.18
Age-adjusted D-dimer cutoffs perform well for ruling out PE in outpatients, but higher thresholds (e.g., 2x ULN) are required for inpatients to maintain acceptable specificity.
Age-adjusted D-dimer may aid outpatient PE rule-out but not inpatient; supports setting-specific thresholds pending prospective validation.
INTRODUCTION: The diagnosis of acute pulmonary embolism (PE) is combinations of clinical probability assessments, plasma D-dimer (DD) test results, and/or computed tomographic pulmonary angiography (CTPA). OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to explore the appropriate DD cutoff using the immunoturbidimetric method in outpatients and inpatients. METHODS: We retrospectively enrolled 2689 patients with suspected PE between January 2014 and December 2019. All patients underwent clinical probability assessments, DD tests, and CTPA. We investigated the appropriate cutoff level for plasma DD tests in the correlation analysis and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. RESULTS: Among all patients, 1263 were confirmed acute PE. The age-adjusted DD level was determined to be age × 10 μg/L (for patients aged >50 years) in outpatients. This cutoff value resulted in a sensitivity of 96.75% and a specificity of 87.02%, with the area under the curve (AUC) of 0.908 and the number needed to treat (NNT) of 1.18. For inpatients, the age-adjusted cutoff values for the biomarker DD demonstrated poor specificity (13.34%) and NNT (9.88). However, when the DD cutoff was adjusted to 2 × the upper limit of normal (ULN), the sensitivity increased to 93.19%, while the specificity remained at 29.55%, with the AUC of 0.610 and the NNT of 4.76. The optimal DD cut-off value was 3010 μg/L (about 5 × ULN), resulting in a sensitivity of 75.22% and specificity of 61.72%, with the AUC of 0.727 and the NNT of 2.7. CONCLUSION: Using the immunoturbidimetric method to measure DD, an age-adjusted DD cutoff (age × 10 μg/L, if aged >50 years) should be considered for outpatients with suspected PE. For inpatients, increasing the DD cutoff value to at least 2 × ULN yields the best test performance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liu et al. (2024) conducted an observational in suspected acute pulmonary embolism (n=2,689). Age-adjusted D-dimer threshold was evaluated on Diagnosis of acute pulmonary embolism (NNT 1.18). An age-adjusted D-dimer threshold yielded 96.75% sensitivity and 87.02% specificity in outpatients, while a threshold of at least 2 × ULN performed best for inpatients.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: