Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The photophysical and electroluminescent device properties of a series of d 6 transition metal complexes that feature an oligo(aryleneethynylene) (OAE) “ligand” have been investigated. The metals are coordinated η 2 - to the OAE via a 2,2‘-bipyridine moiety that is in the “core” of the oligomer, and the metals used are η 2 -Ir(ppy) 2 +, η 2 -Ru(bpy) 2 2+, and η 2 -Os(bpy) 2 2+ (Ir-2, Ru-2, and Os-2, respectively, where ppy = 2-phenylpyridine and bpy = 2,2‘-bipyridine). The photoluminescence spectra and excited-state decay parameters for the metal−OAEs indicate that at ambient temperature Ru-2 and Os-2 feature a lowest 3 MLCT excited state; however, in Ir-2 the lowest excited state is 3 π,π* localized on the OAE. Electroluminescent (EL) devices that contain the metal−OAEs dispersed at 5 wt % in a poly(vinyl carbazole):2-(4- tert -butylphenyl)-5-(4-biphenylyl)-1,3,4-oxadiazole matrix exhibit electroluminescence at wavelengths that correlate well with the photoluminescence from the complexes in a rigid glass at low temperature. The EL efficiency of the devices varies in the order Ir-2 > Ru-2 ≫ Os-2. Factors that may contribute to the difference in EL efficiencies are discussed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cunningham et al. (2003) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: