Key result
Upper-extremity exercise training in heart failure patients increased test duration by 22% (P=0.008) and improved Minnesota Living With Heart Failure Questionnaire scores (P=0.02).
Why the study?
Does upper-extremity exercise training improve exercise capacity and quality of life in patients with heart failure?
Does upper-extremity exercise training improve exercise capacity and quality of life in patients with heart failure?
Upper-extremity exercise training is safe, well-tolerated, and improves exercise duration and quality of life in heart failure patients, offering a viable alternative for those unable to perform lower-extremity exercise.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May offer alternative training option for HF patients unable to perform lower-extremity exercise; leaves open confirmation in randomized trials.
PURPOSE: Aerobic exercise training (ExTR), predominantly performed with lower extremities, has been used to reverse heart failure (HF)-related exercise intolerance. The present study determined the safety and efficacy of upper-extremity exercise in HF subjects because daily activities are performed using both upper and lower extremities and there is little cross-training effects between extremities. METHODS: Seven subjects underwent 36 sessions (40 minutes, 3 times per week for 12 weeks) of upper-extremity ExTR (ARM ExTR) using arm ergometers, the arm function of a NuStep device, and an Airdyne stationary cycle. Exercise intensity and duration during weeks 1 to 4 were gradually increased to achieve a 75% to 85% peak heart rate. Pre- and post-ExTR tests included arm ergometer cardiopulmonary testing with echocardiography and quality of life self-administered surveys. RESULTS: After ARM ExTR test duration increased by 22% (P = .008), respiratory exchange ratio increased by 10% (P = .02), whereas peak oxygen consumption was not improved. Echocardiographic parameters were not altered by ARM ExTR. The total scores of both the Minnesota Living With Heart Failure Questionnaire (P = .02) and the Medical Outcomes Study-36 questionnaire (P = .05) were improved, but the Functional Status Questionnaire scores were not improved. CONCLUSIONS: Although this study was limited in the number of subjects and lacked a control group, results indicate that ARM ExTR is safe and well-tolerated by persons diagnosed with HF, a finding that is relevant for individuals with HF who cannot exercise with lower extremities.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nyquist‐Battie et al. (2007) studied Heart failure (n=7). Upper-extremity exercise training (ARM ExTR) was evaluated on Test duration (p=.008). Upper-extremity exercise training in heart failure patients increased test duration by 22% (P=0.008) and improved Minnesota Living With Heart Failure Questionnaire scores (P=0.02).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: