Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Background: Paclitaxel has recently been approved for AIDS-related Kaposi’s sarcoma (KS) and there is much interest also in HIV-negative KS.Objective: To assess the safety and effectiveness of intravenous paclitaxel in the treatment of non-HIV-associated KS.Method: A retrospective database analysis of our departmental database in histologically proven, HIV-negative KS.Results: Fifty-eight patients treated with intravenous paclitaxel 100 mg weekly were identified. Among these patients, 11 patients underwent paclitaxel as first-line treatment, whereas 47 received paclitaxel after other types of systemic chemotherapy. Fifty-three (94.6%) patients achieved a partial or a complete remission after a mean of 13.5 infusions. Disease progression was observed in two patients and one patient had a stable disease. Thirty-one (58.5%) of 53 responding patients are still stable after a mean of 19.1 months of follow-up, while 22 (41.5%) patients relapsed after a mean of 14 months. Paclitaxel was repeated in relapsed patients obtaining PR/CR in all cases. Tolerance was good except for one patient who discontinued the treatment because of a severe allergic reaction.Conclusion: Paclitaxel is effective for the treatment of non-HIV-related KS, both as first- and as second-line treatment. It is well tolerated and can be repeated without loss of efficacy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tourlaki et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: