Key result
The neurovisceral interaction between Angiotensin II, nitric oxide, and dopamine for blood pressure regulation is asymmetrically organized, with lateralized neuronal activity influencing plasma levels.
This review emphasizes the complex, asymmetrical neurovisceral integration of Angiotensin II, dopamine, and nitric oxide in blood pressure regulation, suggesting potential new avenues for hypertension treatment.
Hypothesis-generating for asymmetric BP targets; leaves open clinical validation before any practice change.
Vital functions, such as blood pressure, are regulated within a framework of neurovisceral integration in which various factors are involved under normal conditions maintaining a delicate balance. Imbalance of any of these factors can lead to various pathologies. Blood pressure control is the result of the balanced action of central and peripheral factors that increase or decrease. Special attention for blood pressure control was put on the neurovisceral interaction between Angiotensin II and the enzymes that regulate its activity as well as on nitric oxide and dopamine. Several studies have shown that such interaction is asymmetrically organized. These studies suggest that the neuronal activity related to the production of nitric oxide in plasma is also lateralized and, consequently, changes in plasma nitric oxide influence neuronal function. This observation provides a new aspect revealing the complexity of the blood pressure regulation and, undoubtedly, makes such study more motivating as it may affect the approach for treatment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Banegas et al. (2019) conducted a review in Blood pressure regulation. Neurovisceral interaction between Angiotensin II, nitric oxide, and dopamine was evaluated. The neurovisceral interaction between Angiotensin II, nitric oxide, and dopamine for blood pressure regulation is asymmetrically organized, with lateralized neuronal activity influencing plasma levels.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: