Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We develop a method for determining the significance of the effect of a certain event (stock split, corporate restructuring, change in regulation, etc.) on unsystematic volatility of asset returns. Simulations show that the suggested tests reject the true null hypothesis of no effect on volatility at appropriate levels, whereas the rejection rates of a false null hypothesis increase with the magnitude of the effect. An application of the method to corporate spin‐offs reveals statistically significant and long‐lasting estimated increases in unsystematic volatility of parent companies' returns.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hilliard et al. (2002) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: