Key result
Initiating sulphonylurea monotherapy for type 2 diabetes was associated with an increased risk of ventricular arrhythmia compared with metformin.
Why the study?
It was unknown whether initiating sulphonylurea monotherapy compared with metformin monotherapy is associated with an increased risk of ventricular arrhythmia in type 2 diabetes.
Does sulphonylurea monotherapy increase the risk of ventricular arrhythmia compared to metformin monotherapy in patients initiating pharmacotherapy for type 2 diabetes?
Cohort (n=599,520)
Does sulphonylurea monotherapy increase the risk of ventricular arrhythmia compared to metformin monotherapy in patients initiating pharmacotherapy for type 2 diabetes?
Initiating type 2 diabetes treatment with sulphonylureas instead of metformin is associated with a significantly increased risk of ventricular arrhythmias.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May warrant caution with initial sulphonylurea use in type 2 diabetes; leaves open causality and requires prospective confirmation.
AIM: To determine whether the use of sulphonylurea monotherapy, compared with metformin monotherapy, is associated with an increased risk of ventricular arrhythmia (VA) among patients initiating pharmacotherapy for type 2 diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We conducted a population-based cohort study using electronic health data extracted from the UK's Clinical Practice Research Datalink Aurum. Using the active comparator, new-user cohort design, we compared rates of VA among patients aged 18 years or older using sulphonylurea monotherapy with those using metformin monotherapy as their initial pharmacological treatment for type 2 diabetes from April 1998 to December 2019. We used a Cox proportional hazards model with inverse probability of treatment weighting by propensity score to estimate the adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) and a corresponding bootstrap 95% confidence interval (CI) for VA with sulphonylurea monotherapy versus metformin monotherapy. RESULTS: The cohort included 92 638 new users of sulphonylurea and 506 882 new users of metformin. A total of 279 VA events occurred among sulphonylurea users (rate per 10 000 person-years: 25.5, 95% CI: 22.7 to 28.7) and 1537 VA events occurred among metformin users (rate per 10 000 person-years: 18.5, 95% CI: 17.6 to 19.5). Compared with metformin, sulphonylureas were associated with an increased risk of VA (aHR: 1.42, 95% CI: 1.18 to 1.69). CONCLUSIONS: Sulphonylureas are associated with an increased risk of VA when used as first-line therapy for type 2 diabetes relative to metformin use. This increased risk should be considered when prescribing sulphonylureas as an initial treatment for type 2 diabetes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Islam et al. (2023) conducted a cohort in type 2 diabetes (n=599,520). Sulphonylurea monotherapy vs. Metformin monotherapy was evaluated on ventricular arrhythmia (aHR 1.42, 95% CI 1.18 to 1.69). Initiating sulphonylurea monotherapy for type 2 diabetes was associated with an increased risk of ventricular arrhythmia compared with metformin.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: