Key result
Males with cervical spinal cord injury showed no increase in systolic blood pressure following maximal arm crank exercise (103.8 mmHg) compared to a significant increase in able-bodied controls (154.0 mmHg).
Why the study?
Does peak voluntary exercise on an arm crank ergometer affect cardiovascular responses differently in males with cervical spinal cord injury compared to able-bodied controls?
Case-Control (n=47)
No
Does peak voluntary exercise on an arm crank ergometer affect cardiovascular responses differently in males with cervical spinal cord injury compared to able-bodied controls?
Standardized Mean Difference: 2.9
Absolute Event Rate: 103.8% vs 154%
p-value: p=<0.001
Males with cervical spinal cord injury do not exhibit the normal increase in blood pressure following maximal arm crank exercise, putting them at risk for severe hypotension.
Cervical SCI males may risk post-exercise hypotension during arm crank testing; hypothesis-generating for autonomic cardiovascular responses.
CONTEXT/OBJECTIVE: Traumatic damage to the cervical spinal cord is usually associated with a disruption of the autonomic nervous system (ANS) and impaired cardiovascular control both during and following exercise. The magnitude of the cardiovascular dysfunction remains unclear. The aim of the current study was to compare cardiovascular responses to peak voluntary exercise in individuals with tetraplegia and able-bodied participants. DESIGN: A case-control study. SUBJECTS: Twenty males with cervical spinal cord injury (SCI) as the Tetra group and 27 able-bodied males as the Control group were included in the study. OUTCOME MEASURES: Blood pressure (BP) response one minute after the peak exercise, peak heart rate (HRpeak), and peak oxygen consumption (VO2peak) on an arm crank ergometer were measured. In the second part of the study, 17 individuals of the Control group completed the Tetra group's workload protocol with the same parameters recorded. RESULTS: There was no increase in BP in response to the exercise in the Tetra group. Able-bodied individuals exhibited significantly increased post-exercise systolic BP after the maximal graded exercise test (123±16%) and after completion of the Tetra group's workload protocol (114±11%) as compared to pre-exercise. The Tetra group VO2peak was 59% and the HRpeak was 73% of the Control group VO2peak and HRpeak, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: BP did not increase following maximal arm crank exercise in males with a cervical SCI unlike the increases observed in the Control group. Some males in the Tetra group appeared to be at risk of severe hypotension following high intensity exercise, which can limit the ability to progressive increase and maintain high intensity exercise.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Macháč et al. (2015) conducted a case-control in Cervical spinal cord injury (tetraplegia) (n=47). Cervical spinal cord injury vs. Able-bodied males was evaluated on Systolic blood pressure one minute after peak voluntary arm crank exercise (Cohen's d 2.9, p=<0.001). Males with cervical spinal cord injury showed no increase in systolic blood pressure following maximal arm crank exercise (103.8 mmHg) compared to a significant increase in able-bodied controls (154.0 mmHg).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: