Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This article aims to stimulate debate about the nature of field courses in higher education. We use a colloquium format that allows each of us to reflect on the philosophy of field course teaching and our writing endeavours to establish a dialogue between the authors and leave the reader with a sense of curiosity. It starts with a position paper that sets out a particular viewpoint on field courses to which responses were invited. Two of the respondents were experienced field-course teachers in disciplines traditionally associated with this type of curriculum, the other a lecturer in a non-field-course-oriented discipline.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Harland et al. (2005) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: