Key result
In patients at high risk for coronary artery disease, a metabolic syndrome severity score of ≥4 was strongly associated with an increased risk of diastolic heart failure compared to a score of 0 (OR 6.61).
Why the study?
Does metabolic syndrome and its severity predict the presence of diastolic heart failure in patients at high risk for coronary artery disease?
Case-Control (n=261)
No
Does metabolic syndrome and its severity predict the presence of diastolic heart failure in patients at high risk for coronary artery disease?
Odds Ratio: 6.61 (95% CI 4.9–8.9)
Absolute Event Rate: 89.47% vs 20.83%
p-value: p=<0.001
Metabolic syndrome and its severity score are strongly and independently associated with the presence of diastolic heart failure in patients at high risk for coronary artery disease.
May aid diastolic HF risk stratification in high-risk CAD patients; leaves open prospective validation and incremental utility.
BACKGROUND: The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the effect and predictive value of metabolic syndrome (MetS) and its components on diastolic heart failure (DHF) in patients at high risk for coronary artery disease (CAD). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We enrolled 261 patients with normal left ventricular ejection fraction (≥50%) who were scheduled to undergo coronary angiography for suspected myocardial ischemia. They were categorized into three groups (non-MetS, pre-MetS and MetS) based on the number of MetS criteria. Echocardiography was used to assess left ventricular (LV) diastolic function. The association between MetS and DHF was assessed by multivariate logistic regression (MLR) analysis (non-DHF patients as reference group) after controlling for confounders. The predictive performance of the MetS severity score (MSS) was evaluated using the area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC). RESULTS: A tendency toward increased DHF prevalence with increasing MSS was found (p < 0.001). MLR analysis showed that in patients with an MSS of 1, the odds ratio (OR) of DHF was 1.60 (95% confidence interval-CI, 1.19-2.16; p = 0.02) compared to non-DHF patients; in patients with MSS ≥4, the OR was 6.61 (95% CI, 4.90-8.90; p < 0.001) compared to non-DHF patients. MSSs strongly predicted DHF (AUC = 0.73, 95% CI, 0.66-0.78, p < 0.001). MLR with MetS components as binary variables showed that blood pressure (BP) and triglycerides (TGs) were significantly associated with DHF (P = 0.001 and 0.043, respectively). CONCLUSION: Our findings signify that MetS and its components of BP or TG were associated with DHF in high-risk CAD patients. DHF prevalence tends to increase with increasing MSS that has a high value in predicting DHF in high-risk CAD patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tang et al. (2013) conducted a case-control in High risk for coronary artery disease (n=261). Metabolic syndrome severity score ≥4 vs. Metabolic syndrome severity score 0 (non-MetS) was evaluated on Diastolic heart failure (DHF) (OR 6.61, 95% CI 4.90-8.90, p=<0.001). In patients at high risk for coronary artery disease, a metabolic syndrome severity score of ≥4 was strongly associated with an increased risk of diastolic heart failure compared to a score of 0 (OR 6.61).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: