Why the study?
Does infarct site (anterior vs inferior) affect global and regional left ventricular function in patients with transmural myocardial infarction?
Does infarct site (anterior vs inferior) affect global and regional left ventricular function in patients with transmural myocardial infarction?
Anterior myocardial infarction results in a significantly greater depression of global and regional left ventricular function compared to inferior myocardial infarction.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Anterior MI may warrant site-specific LV assessment; leaves open whether location guides risk models or trials in transmural infarction.
Radionuclide angiography was performed on 41 patients with transmural myocardial infarction (MI) [17: anterior MI, 24: inferior MI] and 10 normal subjects in order to evaluate the influence of the infarct site on the global and the regional left ventricular function. The severity of the wall motion abnormality agreed closely with the reduction in the relative regional ejection fraction (%REF). The depression of the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) in anterior MI was greater than that in inferior MI (p less than 0.01). We also found that the depression of the performance in the infarcted zone in anterior MI was more marked than that in inferior MI (p less than 0.01). However, function in the non-infarcted zone was almost the same in the anterior MI as in the inferior MI. As to the extent of the hypokinetic area, there was no significant difference between the patients with anterior MI and those with inferior MI. The above results indicated that the infarct site is an important determinant of the regional and the global left ventricular function after MI.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Imai et al. (1984) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: