Why the study?
Outcome registries are increasingly used to drive quality improvement, prompting the need to develop a standardised set of variables for abdominal aortic aneurysm repair quality improvement registries.
An international Delphi consensus established a core set of 70 variables for AAA repair registries to harmonize observational research and quality improvement globally.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Standardizes AAA registry data collection globally; extends capacity for harmonized observational research and quality improvement.
OBJECTIVE: Outcome registries in vascular surgery are used increasingly to drive quality improvement by vascular societies. The VASCUNET collaboration, within the European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS), and the International Consortium of Vascular Registries (ICVR) developed a set of variables for quality improvement registries on abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair as a registry standard. METHODS: Representatives from international vascular registries within VASCUNET, ICVR, and other nations with established registries were invited to provide the variables. The final variables were developed through a two stage modified Delphi process. Variables from the established registries with at least 60% consensus among all the registries were included for round 1. A five point Likert scale (strongly disagree to fully agree) was used. If the limit of consensual agreement was not reached in round 1, the variable was discussed again in round 2. For round 2, an array question method (yes, no to unsure) was used. Agreement of at least 70% resulted in the variable being included in the final dataset. RESULTS: A total of 88 of 371 variables extracted from all AAA registries were circulated in the modified Delphi process as they reached the 60% consensus threshold. The questionnaire was circulated to 55 participants (round 1: 49; 89%; round 2: 43; 78%). After two rounds, 70 variables were recommended on consensual agreement. These variables comprised demographics (n = 4), pre-operative information (n = 28), intra-operative variables (n = 18), post-operative variables (n = 5), and follow up (n = 13). CONCLUSION: Based on this modified Delphi process, an international panel of vascular surgeons representing quality improvement registries recommended 70 core variables as standard in AAA repair registries. The inclusion of a core set of variables in AAA vascular registries may help to further harmonise observational research and quality of AAA repair among global healthcare systems.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Grima et al. (2024) studied Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm (AAA) repair registries (n=49). Modified Delphi consensus process was evaluated on Consensus on core variables for AAA repair registries. An international panel of vascular surgeons and registry representatives reached consensus on 70 core variables to be included as a standard in abdominal aortic aneurysm repair quality improvement registries.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: