Key result
Big data and registries in vascular surgery have expanded significantly, offering benefits for discovery and quality improvement despite challenges like hypothesis fishing and lack of granularity.
Why the study?
Given the growing use and pitfalls of big data and registries in vascular surgery, this review highlights key registries, their successes in quality improvement and discovery, and future directions for utilization in vascular disease.
This review provides an overview of the current state and future directions of big data and registries in vascular surgery.
Supports cautious integration of vascular surgery registries for quality improvement; leaves open standardization to address granularity and hypothesis fishing.
Given the increasing availability of large data set, small single-institutional series raise decreasing attention. Rapid expansion of technology from electronic medical records to easily accessible internet access, and widespread use and acceptance of registries in the medical world has allowed for research and quality improvement efforts using 'big data'. Big data, although technically not defined, typically refers to large databases that can be used to investigate common or rare disease processes or outcomes, describe variation in clinical practices across and between different specialties at various practice location, whilst allowing important information about trends over time. Big data have allowed investigators to quickly assimilate cohorts of patients and/or procedures to answer current questions, with more complete population representation and improved generalizability whilst decreasing the likelihood of power problems and type II errors. On the other hand, pitfalls still exist with the growing problem of hypothesis fishing, lack of granularity and the fear by many clinicians that registry transparency may have already gone too far, where surgery groups or individual surgeon outcomes are readily available to patients and referring providers. Within vascular surgery specifically, big data have expanded over the last decade and now includes regional, national and global registries that have major benefits of gathering specific clinical and procedural information within vascular surgery. In this review, we highlight the main vascular surgery registries and recap a few success stories of how the registries have been leveraged to benefit discovery, quality improvement and ultimately patient care. Additionally, we outline future directions that will be imperative for continued expansion, acceptance and adoption of 'big data' utilization inpatients with vascular disease.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sutzko et al. (2020) conducted a review in vascular disease. Big data and registries was evaluated. Big data and registries in vascular surgery have expanded significantly, offering benefits for discovery and quality improvement despite challenges like hypothesis fishing and lack of granularity.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: