Key result
Catheter ablation significantly reduced AF burden from 43.8% at baseline to 15.0% at 8 months (p=0.003) in patients with implanted pacemakers, though AF recurrence remained common.
Why the study?
Does catheter ablation reduce AF burden in patients with atrial fibrillation and implanted permanent pacemakers?
Cohort (n=25)
Does catheter ablation reduce AF burden in patients with atrial fibrillation and implanted permanent pacemakers?
Catheter ablation significantly reduces AF burden and improves quality of life in patients with pacemakers, although complete long-term freedom from arrhythmia is achieved in only a minority of patients.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May reduce AF burden in pacemaker patients; hypothesis-generating for randomized outcome trials.
BACKGROUND: The practise of catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) is increasing rapidly and is recommended as the treatment of choice in many patient subgroups. At present, the efficacy of this procedure has been assessed by means of electrocardiographic recording, intermittent Holter monitoring and evaluation of patient symptoms. We sought to evaluate the true efficacy of this procedure in patients with sophisticated permanent pacemakers capable of continuous long-term cardiac rhythm monitoring. METHODS: Twenty-five patients (aged 63.7 (9.4), 20 men), seven with persistent AF and 18 with prolonged paroxysmal AF, underwent a mean of 1.7 AF ablation procedures. All the patients had previously been implanted with a pacemaker or atrial defibrillator device. Data were downloaded from the device Holter before catheter ablation and at 2, 4, 6 and 8 months postprocedure(s). The primary outcome measure was AF burden. The secondary outcomes were patient symptom and quality-of-life measures. RESULTS: Initial AF burden was 43.8 (35.5)%. After catheter ablation(s), this was significantly reduced at 2 months to 23.8 (35.4)% (p=0.023), at 4 months to 21.4 (34.1)% (p=0.008), at 6 months to 14.5 (28.1)% (p=0.002) and at 8 months to 15.0 (29.4%) (p=0.003). Only nine (36%) of 25 patients demonstrated no recurrence of arrhythmia during follow-up completion, consistent with a long-term cure. Quality-of-life indices showed significant improvement after ablation. CONCLUSIONS: Catheter ablation for AF significantly improves patient symptoms and reduces AF burden after long-term beat-to-beat monitoring by implanted cardiac pacemaker and defibrillator devices. However, AF recurrence is common after these procedures.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Veasey et al. (2010) conducted a cohort in Atrial fibrillation (n=25). Catheter ablation (pulmonary vein isolation and wide-area left atrial ablation) vs. Pre-ablation (baseline) was evaluated on AF burden (p=0.003). Catheter ablation significantly reduced AF burden from 43.8% at baseline to 15.0% at 8 months (p=0.003) in patients with implanted pacemakers, though AF recurrence remained common.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: