Key result
In children with familial hypercholesterolemia, pravastatin yielded a similar decrease in carotid IMT between those with null alleles and receptor-defective mutations (0.018 vs 0.012 mm; P=0.7).
Why the study?
Does LDL receptor genotype predict the response to pravastatin in children with familial hypercholesterolemia?
RCT (n=193)
double-blind
randomized
Does LDL receptor genotype predict the response to pravastatin in children with familial hypercholesterolemia?
Absolute Event Rate: 0.018% vs 0.012%
p-value: p=0.7
In children with familial hypercholesterolemia, null allele genotype is associated with greater baseline carotid IMT and higher LDL cholesterol, but does not significantly attenuate the IMT benefit of pravastatin therapy compared to receptor-defective mutations.
Similar carotid IMT reduction with pravastatin irrespective of LDL receptor genotype in children with FH; confirms genotype does not predict treatment response.
BACKGROUND: The lipid-lowering effects of statin therapy show considerable interindividual variation in patients with familial hypercholesterolemia (FH). Whether the type of LDL receptor mutation predicts the response to statin treatment is not yet established. We analyzed the relationship between LDL receptor genotype and response to pravastatin treatment in children with FH using carotid intima-media thickness (IMT) to measure efficacy. METHODS AND RESULTS: In a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, 2-year trial with pravastatin, 193 children had genetically confirmed FH and were included in the present substudy. At baseline, children with null alleles had higher LDL cholesterol levels (difference, 0.94+/-0.19 mmol/L [SEM]; P<0.001) and a greater carotid IMT (difference, 0.019+/-0.01 mm; P=0.02) compared with children with receptor-defective mutations. The decrease in carotid IMT during the trial was not significantly different in children with null alleles and receptor-defective mutations (0.018+/-0.012 and 0.012+/-0.010 mm; 2-way ANCOVA, P=0.7). After 2 years of treatment, the children with null alleles continued to have greater carotid IMT than children with receptor-defective mutations (difference, 0.016+/-0.01 mm; P=0.02). LDL cholesterol lowering tended to be less in carriers of null alleles compared with carriers of receptor-defective mutations (1.30+/-0.25 and 1.85+/-0.20 mmol/L; 2-way ANCOVA, P=0.08). CONCLUSIONS: In FH children, we found that the null allele genotype was associated with a greater carotid IMT, higher LDL cholesterol levels, and a nonsignificant tendency to attenuated LDL cholesterol lowering compared with receptor-defective mutations. Null alleles identify FH patients at the highest cardiovascular disease risk who may benefit from more aggressive treatment started in childhood.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Koeijvoets et al. (2005) conducted an RCT in familial hypercholesterolemia (n=193). Pravastatin (null alleles) vs. Pravastatin (receptor-defective mutations) was evaluated on decrease in carotid intima-media thickness (IMT) (p=0.7). In children with familial hypercholesterolemia, pravastatin yielded a similar decrease in carotid IMT between those with null alleles and receptor-defective mutations (0.018 vs 0.012 mm; P=0.7).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: