Key result
Decreased postprocedural LVEF after percutaneous edge-to-edge mitral valve repair was associated with increased mortality (HR 2.05; 95% CI 1.26-3.34) compared to unchanged LVEF.
Why the study?
Afterload mismatch after percutaneous edge-to-edge mitral valve repair has been postulated to be a transient phenomenon, and the impact of periprocedural LVEF changes on long-term outcome in secondary mitral regurgitation was unknown.
Does a change in postprocedural LVEF affect survival in patients undergoing percutaneous edge-to-edge mitral valve repair for secondary mitral regurgitation?
Observational (n=399)
No
Does a change in postprocedural LVEF affect survival in patients undergoing percutaneous edge-to-edge mitral valve repair for secondary mitral regurgitation?
Hazard Ratio: 2.05 (95% CI 1.26–3.34)
In patients undergoing percutaneous edge-to-edge mitral valve repair for secondary mitral regurgitation, a decrease in postprocedural LVEF is associated with increased long-term mortality, whereas an improvement in LVEF is associated with reduced mortality.
Postprocedural LVEF changes may inform mortality risk stratification after mitral TEER; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation.
Objectives: To investigate how the changes of left ventricle ejection fraction (LVEF) between admission and discharge affected the long-term outcome in patients who underwent percutaneous edge-to-edge mitral valve repair for secondary mitral regurgitation. Background: An acute impairment of LVEF after surgical repair of mitral regurgitation, known as afterload mismatch, has been associated with increased all-cause mortality. Afterload mismatch after percutaneous edge-to-edge mitral valve repair has been postulated to be a transient phenomenon. Methods: This study is based on a single-center, retrospective, observational registry of patients who underwent percutaneous edge-to-edge mitral valve repair with the MitraClip (Abbot Vascular) system for the treatment of symptomatic, moderate-to-severe mitral regurgitation. We included data on 399 patients who underwent percutaneous edge-to-edge mitral valve repair for secondary mitral regurgitation. Expert echocardiographers assessed LVEF before the procedure and at discharge. The patients were divided into three groups according to the difference of periprocedural LVEF measurements: unchanged (n = 318), improved (n = 40), and decreased (n = 41) LVEF. Results: The median follow-up time was 2.0 years. When adjusted for gender, NYHA class and estimated glomerular filtration rate, decreased postprocedural LVEF was associated with an increased risk of death (adjusted HR 2.05, 95% CI 1.26–3.34) and increased postprocedural LVEF with a reduced risk of death (adjusted HR 0.47, 95% CI 0.24–0.91) compared to unchanged LVEF. Conclusion: Among patients who underwent percutaneous edge-to-edge mitral valve repair, decreased postprocedural LVEF was associated with increased mortality, while improved LVEF was associated with lower mortality compared to unchanged LVEF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hagnäs et al. (2021) conducted an observational in secondary mitral regurgitation (n=399). Decreased postprocedural LVEF vs. Unchanged LVEF was evaluated on death (HR 2.05, 95% CI 1.26-3.34). Decreased postprocedural LVEF after percutaneous edge-to-edge mitral valve repair was associated with increased mortality (HR 2.05; 95% CI 1.26-3.34) compared to unchanged LVEF.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: