Key result
Irradiated carotid arteries in head and neck cancer patients had a significantly higher prevalence of stenosis compared to unirradiated arteries (74% vs 32%; P<0.0001).
Why the study?
Does unilateral neck irradiation increase the prevalence of carotid artery stenosis compared to the unirradiated contralateral side in head and neck cancer patients?
Cross-Sectional (n=50)
Does unilateral neck irradiation increase the prevalence of carotid artery stenosis compared to the unirradiated contralateral side in head and neck cancer patients?
Absolute Event Rate: 74% vs 32%
p-value: p=<0.0001
Radiation therapy significantly increases the risk of carotid atherosclerosis in head and neck cancer patients, a risk that is underestimated by traditional risk prediction models like QRISK-2 and QSTROKE.
Supports radiation-associated carotid stenosis risk; leaves open whether targeted surveillance or updated risk models improve outcomes.
BACKGROUND: Primary radical radiotherapy (RT) for head and neck cancer (HNC) often results in significant radiation dose to the carotid arteries. AIM: We assessed whether HNC patients are at increased risk of a cerebrovascular event primarily due to RT or other risk factors for atherosclerosis by (i) risk-stratifying patients according to validated QRISK-2 and QSTROKE scores and (ii) comparing the prevalence of carotid artery stenosis (CAS) in irradiated and unirradiated carotid arteries. DESIGN: HNC patients treated with an RT dose >50 Gy to one side of the neck ≥2 years previously were included. METHODS: QRISK-2 (2014) and Q-STROKE (2014) scores were calculated. We compared the prevalence of CAS in segments of the common carotid artery on the irradiated and unirradiated sides of the neck. RESULTS: Fifty patients (median age of 58 years (interquartile range (IQR) 50-62)) were included. The median QRISK-2 score was 10% (IQR 4.4-15%) and the median QSTROKE score was 3.4% (IQR 1.4-5.3%). For both scores, no patient was classified as high risk. Thirty-eight patients (76%) had CAS in one or both arteries. There was a significant difference in the number of irradiated arteries with stenosis (N = 37) compared with unirradiated arteries (N = 16) (P < 0.0001). There were more plaques on the irradiated artery compared with the unirradiated side - 64/87 (73.6%) versus 23/87 (26.4%), respectively (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Traditional vascular risk factors do not play a role in radiation-induced carotid atherosclerosis. Clinicians should be aware that traditional risk prediction models may under-estimate stroke risk in these patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gujral et al. (2015) conducted a cross-sectional in Head and neck cancer (n=50). Radiotherapy to one side of the neck vs. Unirradiated side of the neck was evaluated on Prevalence of carotid artery stenosis (p=<0.0001). Irradiated carotid arteries in head and neck cancer patients had a significantly higher prevalence of stenosis compared to unirradiated arteries (74% vs 32%; P<0.0001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: