Key result
In a survey of 2,117 CIED implants in India, pacemakers constituted 80% of devices (predominantly for AV block), while ICDs and CRTs formed approximately 10% each.
Why the study?
What are the demographics, indications, and trends of cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) implantation in India?
Cross-Sectional (n=2,117)
Yes
What are the demographics, indications, and trends of cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) implantation in India?
In India, the vast majority of CIED implants are pacemakers for bradyarrhythmias (predominantly AV block), with a male predominance and frequent use of single-chamber devices.
Pacemaker predominance for AV block in India underscores bradyarrhythmia priorities; leaves open barriers to ICD/CRT access and need for prospective data.
BACKGROUND: There is limited data regarding the demographics and type of cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) in India. AIM: The aim of this survey was to define trends in CIED implants, which included permanent pacemakers (PM), intracardiac defibrillators (ICD), and cardiac resynchronization therapy pacemakers and defibrillators (CRT-P/D) devices in India. METHODS: The survey was the initiative of the Indian Society of Electrocardiology and the Indian Heart Rhythm Society. The type of CIED used, their indications, demographic characteristics, clinical status and co-morbidities were collected using a survey form over a period of 1 year. RESULTS: 2117 forms were analysed from 136 centers. PM for bradyarrhythmic indication constituted 80% of the devices implanted with ICD's and CRT-P/D forming approximately 10% each. The most common indication for PM implantation was complete atrio-ventricular block (76%). Single chamber (VVI) pacemakers formed 54% of implants, majority in males (64%). The indication for ICD implantation was almost equal for primary and secondary prevention. A single chamber ICD was most commonly implanted (65%). Coronary artery disease was the etiology in 58.5% of patients with ICD implants. CRT pacemakers were implanted mostly in patients with NYHA III/IV (82%), left ventricular ejection fraction <0.35 (88%) with CRT-P being most commonly used (57%). CONCLUSION: A large proportion of CIED implants in India are PM for bradyarrhythmic indications, predominantly AV block. ICD's are implanted almost equally for primary and secondary prophylaxis. Most CRT devices are implanted for NYHA Class III. There is a male predominance for implantation of CIED.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shenthar et al. (2016) conducted a cross-sectional in Cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) implantation (n=2,117). Cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) implantation was evaluated on Trends and indications for CIED implants. In a survey of 2,117 CIED implants in India, pacemakers constituted 80% of devices (predominantly for AV block), while ICDs and CRTs formed approximately 10% each.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: