Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Purpose: To compare the clinical effects of postoperative versus perioperative injection of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) drugs before and after pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) in patients with vitreous hemorrhage secondary to polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV). Methods: This was a retrospective study of patients who underwent PPV due to vitreous hemorrhage between October 2013 and June 2019 at Ningbo Eye Hospital. The patients who underwent PPV surgery due to PCV-secondary vitreous hemorrhage were included. The primary outcome was the changes in best-corrected visual acuity. The secondary outcome was the central macular thickness. Results: Compared with the postoperative group (n = 20), the perioperative group (n = 18) showed a smaller number of postoperative anti-VEGF injections (5.1 ± 0.8 vs. 8.0 ± 1.5, P < 0.05) and lower frequencies of early hyphema (5.6% vs. 30.0%, P < 0.05), and recurrent vitreous hemorrhage (11.1% vs. 30.0%, P < 0.05). The logarithm of minimal angle resolution (LogMAR) was smaller in the perioperative group compared with the postoperative group at 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months after PPV (P < 0.05), but there were no differences thereafter. Compared with the postoperative group, the perioperative group had thinner fovea at 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months (P < 0.05), but the differences disappeared after 3 months. Conclusion: In patients with PCV and vitreous hemorrhage, compared with postoperative anti-VEGF, perioperative anti-VEGF could reduce the difficulty of surgery and reduce the occurrence of postoperative complications, but there were no differences in long-term vision and macular thickness after surgery.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chen et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: