Why the study?
Does hospital cardiology outpatient care compared to primary care improve compliance to secondary prevention therapeutic goals in CHD patients?
Does hospital cardiology outpatient care compared to primary care improve compliance to secondary prevention therapeutic goals in CHD patients?
CHD patients have a high prevalence of modifiable risk factors with poor achievement of lipid targets in both hospital and primary care settings, highlighting the need for further educational efforts.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Low lipid target achievement persists across settings; hypothesis-generating for care-location effects and warrants prospective trials before guiding secondary prevention.
BACKGROUND: Coronary heart disease (CHD) is the leading cause of death in the developed world. We studied compliance to a secondary prevention programme for CHD patients and possible gender differences. DESIGN AND METHODS: Cross-sectional survey of CHD patients aged up to 75 years attending a hospital cardiology outpatient clinic (n = 441; 16 cardiologists) and 12 primary care centres (n = 319; 28 primary care physicians), by means of a questionnaire. RESULTS: Therapeutic goals in hospital care and in primary care were reached by 36% and 29% (P < 0.05) for cholesterol, 42% and 50% (P < 0.01) for triglycerides, 66% and 72% for blood glucose, 84% and 86% for blood pressure, and 16% and 20% for smoking, respectively. Echocardiography was more frequent in hospital care patients (odds ratio 2.69, P < 0.001). ACE-inhibitors, beta-blockers, antiplatelet and anticoagulant therapy were prescribed similarly in both groups, antidiabetics were less common in hospital care (odds ratio 0.53, P < 0.05). Men were more often subject to echocardiography (odds ratio 2.59, P < 0.001). ACE-inhibitors (odds ratio 2.04, P < 0.01), beta-blockers (odds ratio 1.82, P < 0.001) and antiplatelet or anticoagulant drugs (odds ratio 1.82, P < 0.01) were more common in men; diuretics (odds ratio 0.49, P < 0.01) were more common in women. CONCLUSIONS: CHD patients have a high prevalence of modifiable risk factors. Few reach therapeutic goals for lipid levels, whereas other risk factors are better controlled. A secondary prevention programme is an important aid in preventing CHD but must be followed by further educational efforts in order to be more effective.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kahan et al. (2001) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: