Key result
Dabigatran use was associated with a slightly higher risk of gastrointestinal bleeding compared with warfarin (RR 1.21), whereas no significant difference was found between rivaroxaban and warfarin.
Why the study?
Do non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (dabigatran or rivaroxaban) increase the risk of gastrointestinal bleeding compared to warfarin?
Meta-Analysis
Do non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (dabigatran or rivaroxaban) increase the risk of gastrointestinal bleeding compared to warfarin?
Relative Risk: 1.21 (95% CI 1.05–1.39)
In real-world settings, dabigatran is associated with a slightly higher, dose-dependent risk of gastrointestinal bleeding compared to warfarin, whereas rivaroxaban shows no significant difference.
May suggest GI bleed caution with dabigatran but not rivaroxaban versus warfarin; extends real-world meta-analyses.
Particular concerns have been raised regarding the association between non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) and the risk of gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB); however, current findings are still inconclusive. We conducted a systematic review with a meta-analysis to examine the association between NOACs and GIB in real-life settings. We performed a systematic search of PubMed, EMBASE and CINAHL Plus up to September 2015. Observational studies that evaluated exposure to NOACs reporting GIB outcomes were included. The inverse variance method using the random-effects model was used to calculate the pooled estimates. Eight cohort studies were included in the primary meta-analysis, enrolling 1442 GIB cases among 106 626 dabigatran users (49 486 patient-years), and 184 GIB cases among 10 713 rivaroxaban users (4046 patient-years). The pooled incidence rates of GIB were 4.50 [95% confidence interval (CI) 3.17, 5.84] and 7.18 (95% CI 2.42, 12.0) per 100 patient-years among dabigatran and rivaroxaban users, respectively. The summary risk ratio (RR) was 1.21 (95% CI 1.05, 1.39) for dabigatran compared with warfarin, and 1.09 (95% CI 0.92, 1.30) for rivaroxaban. Subgroup analyses showed a dose-related effect of dabigatran, with a significantly higher risk of GIB for 150 mg b.i.d. (RR = 1.51, 95% CI 1.34, 1.70) but not for 75 mg b.i.d. or 110 mg b.i.d.. In addition, the use of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs)/histamine H2-receptor antagonists (H2RAs) influenced the association in dabigatran users, whereas this effect was modest among rivaroxaban users. In conclusion, our meta-analysis suggested a slightly higher risk of GIB with dabigatran use compared with warfarin, whereas no significant difference was found between rivaroxaban and warfarin for GIB risk.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
He et al. (2016) conducted a meta-analysis in Atrial fibrillation and venous thromboembolism. Dabigatran vs. Warfarin was evaluated on Gastrointestinal bleeding (RR 1.21, 95% CI 1.05, 1.39). Dabigatran use was associated with a slightly higher risk of gastrointestinal bleeding compared with warfarin (RR 1.21), whereas no significant difference was found between rivaroxaban and warfarin.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: