Why the study?
Does high-dose radiotherapy to an AICD cause device malfunction or cardiac symptoms in a patient with NSCLC?
Case Report (n=1)
No
Does high-dose radiotherapy to an AICD cause device malfunction or cardiac symptoms in a patient with NSCLC?
High-dose radiotherapy directly to an AICD was tolerated without device malfunction or cardiac symptoms in a single patient, though routine exceeding of recommended guidelines is not advised.
We report a case of successful full-dose chemoradiotherapy to stage IIIB nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in a 59-year-old man with extensive cardiac history and an automated implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (AICD) located within the radiotherapeutic field. In this case, the AICD was a St. Jude Medical Fortify Assura VR 1257-40Q ICD, and it was implanted prophylactically during bypass grafting. Although we do not recommend routine radiotherapy dose to exceed recommended current guidelines due to the potential risks to the patient, this is a situation where relocation of the device was not possible. Fortunately, our patient was not AICD-dependent; so following much discussion and deliberation, the decision was made to treat the patient with AICD in place. The patient completed definitive chemoradiotherapy with concurrent cisplatin and etoposide and thoracic irradiation to 69.6 Gy. The minimum, maximum, and mean doses to the AICD directly were 13.5 Gy, 52.4 Gy, and 29.3 Gy, respectively. The device withstood full thoracic radiation dose, and the patient denied cardiac symptoms during the time before, during, and after completion of therapy. We sought to offer this case for both teaching and guidance in practice and to contribute to the published literature currently available in this area.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ahmed et al. (2014) conducted a case report in Stage IIIB nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with an AICD (n=1). Full-dose chemoradiotherapy (thoracic irradiation) was evaluated on Device function and cardiac symptoms.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: