Key result
Percutaneous lead extraction and stent placement achieved 100% technical success and rapid symptom resolution in 6 patients with pacemaker-induced SVC syndrome, though 3 required reintervention.
Why the study?
Does percutaneous lead extraction and stent placement improve symptoms in patients with pacemaker-induced SVC syndrome?
Observational (n=6)
No
Does percutaneous lead extraction and stent placement improve symptoms in patients with pacemaker-induced SVC syndrome?
Percutaneous lead extraction with stent placement is a feasible and effective treatment for pacemaker-induced SVC syndrome, though repeat interventions for symptom recurrence are common.
May support percutaneous management of pacemaker-induced SVC syndrome in select patients; leaves open durability and need for prospective trials.
BACKGROUND: We aimed to determine the long-term outcomes of percutaneous lead extraction and stent placement in patients with pacemaker-induced superior vena cava (SVC) syndrome. METHODS: The study retrospectively screened patients who underwent lead extraction followed by central vein stent implantation at Mayo Clinic (Rochester, MN, USA), from January 2005 to December 2012, to identify the patients with pacemaker-induced SVC syndrome. Demographic, clinical, and follow-up characteristics of those patients were collected from electronic medical records. RESULTS: Six cases were identified. The mean (standard deviation) age was 56 (15) years (male, 67%). All patients had permanent dual-chamber pacemakers, with a mean 11-year history of pacemaker placement. The entire device system was explanted in five patients; one patient had a 21-year-old pacemaker lead that could not be removed. Eight stents were implanted in six patients: five patients had one stent, one patient had three. A new pacemaker system was reimplanted through the stented vein in five patients. Technical success was achieved in all patients, without any complication. Symptoms rapidly resolved in all patients after stent deployment. The mean follow-up duration was 48 months (range, 10-100 months). Three patients remained symptom free. Reintervention with percutaneous balloon venoplasty was successful in three patients with symptom recurrence. CONCLUSION: Percutaneous stent implantation after lead removal followed by reimplantation of leads is a feasible alternative therapy for pacemaker-induced SVC syndrome, although some cases may require repeat intervention.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fu et al. (2014) conducted an observational in Pacemaker-induced superior vena cava (SVC) syndrome (n=6). Percutaneous lead extraction and stent placement was evaluated on Technical success and symptom resolution. Percutaneous lead extraction and stent placement achieved 100% technical success and rapid symptom resolution in 6 patients with pacemaker-induced SVC syndrome, though 3 required reintervention.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: