Systematic Review
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Insufficient evidence in abstract to guide OAC vs antiplatelet choice in nonvalvular AF; leaves comparative efficacy open.
N onvalvular atrial fibrillation (AF) is a common cardiac arrhythmia, affecting about 0.7% of the general population.1,2 Its prevalence increases with age; about 5% of people over age 65 years and 10% of people over the age of 80 years experience AF. 1 Nonvalvular AF carries an increased risk of stroke mediated by embolism of stasis-precipitated thrombi originating in the left atrial appendage.Both oral anticoagulants and antiplatelet agents have proven effective for stroke prevention in many patients at high risk for vascular events (ie, for secondary prevention), but primary stroke prevention in patients with nonvalvular AF potentially merits separate consideration because of the suspected cardioembolic mechanism of most strokes in AF patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Aguilar et al. (2008) conducted a systematic review in Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation. Oral Anticoagulants vs. Antiplatelet Therapy was evaluated on Stroke.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: