Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A code is said to be an r-local locally repairable code (LRC) if each of its coordinates can be repaired by accessing at most r other coordinates. When some of the r coordinates are also erased, the r-local LRC cannot accomplish the local repair, which leads to the concept of (r, δ)-locality. A q-ary [n, k] linear code C is said to have (r, δ)-locality (δ ≥ 2) if for each coordinate i, there exists a punctured subcode of C with support containing i, whose length is at most r+δ-1, and whose minimum distance is at least δ. The (r, δ)-LRC can tolerate δ-1 erasures in every local code (i.e., punctured subcode), which degenerates to an r-local LRC when δ = 2. A q-ary (r, δ) LRC is called optimal if it meets the singleton-like bound for (r, δ)-LRCs. A class of optimal q-ary cyclic r-local LRCs with lengths n | q - 1 were constructed by Tamo, Barg, Goparaju, and Calderbank based on the q-ary Reed-Solomon codes. In this paper, we construct a class of optimal q-ary cyclic (r, δ)-LRCs (δ ≥ 2) with length n | q - 1, which generalizes the results of Tamo et al. Moreover, we construct a new class of optimal q-ary cyclic r-local LRCs with lengths n | q + 1 and a new class of optimal q-ary cyclic (r, δ)-LRCs (δ ≥ 2) with lengths n | q + 1. The constructed optimal LRCs with length n = q + 1 have the best-known length for a given finite field with size q when the minimum distance is larger than 4.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chen et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: