Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Association of the human papillomavirus (HPV) E2 protein with its palindromic DNA-binding site is a necessary step for transcriptional trans-activation. To study the interaction between DNA and E2, the carboxyl-terminal domain of HPV-11 E2 protein (E2C) was expressed in Escherichia coli and purified to homogeneity. The binding affinity of the recombinant E2C protein for a single palindromic DNA recognition site was determined using a 5'-fluorescein-labeled 24 base pair oligonucleotide. Competitive titrations between the fluorescein-labeled oligonucleotide and an unlabeled oligonucleotide of identical sequence yielded a native affinity of 4.5 x 10(-9)M. Sequences from the seven E2-binding sites within the HPV-11 genome were titrated to establish a hierarchy of binding site affinities. All high-affinity E2-binding sites are located within or near the HPV-11 LCR. E2-binding sites distant from the LCR appear to have low affinity for E2. When the location and affinity of each E2-binding site are plotted in relation to a transcription map of HPV-11, it is apparent that the major RNA transcripts produced reflect the high-affinity E2-binding sites within the HPV LCR. To assess the E2C-binding contribution of specific base pairs within the oligonucleotide palindrome, additional double-stranded oligonucleotides were prepared in which the central nonpalindromic sequences were varied. While simple strand transposition of the A4.T4 center had a minimal effect upon the E2C-oligonucleotide binding affinity, replacement with TATA.ATAT or CGCG.GCGC centers substantially decreased the affinity of E2C for its binding site. Alteration of the canonical portions of the E2-binding palindrome reduced the DNA-protein binding affinity dramatically.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
William C. Phelps (1996) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: