Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
CeCl3.xTHF (1 < x < 2) reacts with 2 equiv of Cp*Li in THF forming Cp*2CeCl2Li(THF)2.5 (1). The coordinated THF can easily be displaced by DME to form Cp*2CeCl2Li(DME) (2). When 1 is heated to 250 °C (0.01 mmHg), (Cp*2CeCl)n (4) sublimes. A number of adducts, Cp*2CeCl·L, (5, L = THF, n = 1; 6, L = t-BuCN, n = 2), are accessible starting from 4. Metathesis of 4 with LiCH(SiMe3)2 and NaN(SiMe3)2 in toluene gives Cp*2CeCH(SiMe3)2 (8) and Cp*2CeN(SiMe3)2 (11), respectively, Compound 8 reacts with LiCl in the presence of TMEDA to form Cp*2CeCl2Li(TMEDA)2 (3) and LiCH(SiMe3)2. Addition of t-BuCN to 8 affords the adduct Cp*2CeCH(SiMe3)2·t-BuCN (9). (Cp*2CeH)2 (10) can be made by hydrogenolysis of 8 under mild conditions. Cp*2CeNH-t-Bu·NH2-t-Bu (12) and also 11 are prepared by the reaction of 8 with the corresponding amines. 8 crystallizes in the monoclinic space group P21/n with a = 11.061 (3) Å, b = 23.46 (1) Å, c = 11.692 (5) Å, and β = 102.99 (2)° (Z = 4). Least-squares refinement leads to a final R (based on F) of 0.038 for 5534 independent reflections. The molecular structure consists of monomeric Cp*2CeCH(SiMe3)2 units with a bent sandwich configuration. The average (ring centroid)-Ce-(ring centroid) angle is 134°. The CH(SiMe3)2 fragment is coordinated in a highly unsymmetrical fashion with a Ce-C σ-bond distance of 2.536 (5) Å.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Heeres et al. (1988) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: