Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This article uses the properties of the French subnominal clitic en as a probe to explore various issues in current syntactic theory. Section 2 presents some of its chief properties; section 3 deals with the way they relate to the VP‐internal hypothesis for subjects; section 4 discusses the intricate ways in which the null subject parameter interacts with the syntax of en/ne in French and Italian; section 5 analyzes the contrast between “adnominal en”— as in J’en ai lu le premier chapitre (I en‐have read the first chapter) — and “quantitative en”— as in J’en ai lu trois (I en‐have read three) — with respect to preverbal subjects, and explores the respective properties of “en‐cliticization” and nominal ellipses in French and English. It will be shown that a natural extension of Kayne’s (1994:8.6) analysis of de to en sheds light on mysterious properties of en. From a more theoretical perspective, the article can be read as a fresh attempt to vindicate the view that the parallelism between the internal structures of IP and DP is closer than traditionally believed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jean‐Yves Pollock (1998) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: