Key result
The maximum-tolerated dose of amrubicin and cyclophosphamide was 30 mg/m2 and 500 mg/m2, respectively, with a 36.8% partial response rate in small cell lung cancer patients.
Why the study?
What is the maximum-tolerated dose and dose-limiting toxicity of amrubicin combined with cyclophosphamide in patients with advanced solid organ malignancies?
What is the maximum-tolerated dose and dose-limiting toxicity of amrubicin combined with cyclophosphamide in patients with advanced solid organ malignancies?
Amrubicin and cyclophosphamide can be safely combined but showed little activity in heavily pretreated SCLC patients.
Supports dosing for future trials in solid tumors; leaves open meaningful activity in heavily pretreated small cell lung cancer.
OBJECTIVES: Relapsed small cell lung cancer (SCLC) has limited treatment options. Anthracyclines and cyclophosphamide have shown synergy in many tumors. Amrubicin (AMR) and cyclophosphamide both have single-agent activity in SCLC. This phase I trial evaluated the combination of AMR and cyclophosphamide in refractory solid organ malignancies and in relapsed SCLC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The primary endpoint was to determine maximum-tolerated dose and dose-limiting toxicities of the combination. Eligible patients were enrolled in sequential dose escalation cohorts in a standard 3+3 design. Treatment consisted of cyclophosphamide IV at 500 mg/m on day 1 with escalating doses of AMR IV on days 1 to 3 (25 to 40 mg/m with increments of 5 mg/m per cohort). Cycles were repeated every 21 days. Exploratory objectives analyzed the presence of NQO1 polymorphisms and topoisomerase IIA amplification and correlation with response. RESULTS: Thirty-six patients were enrolled, of whom 18 patients had SCLC (50%). Maximum-tolerated dose was determined to be dose level 2 (cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m, AMR 30 mg/m) due to grade 4 thrombocytopenia. The main grade 3 to 4 toxicities were hematologic. Efficacy results are available for 34 patients. Partial responses, stable disease, and progressive disease rates in the overall study population were 20.6% (n=7), 38.2% (n=13), and 41.2% (n=14), respectively. Partial response, stable disease, and progressive disease rates in the SCLC patients and 1 patient with extrathoracic small cell were 36.8% (n=7), 26.3% (n=5), and 36.8% (n=7), respectively. There was no correlation between topoisomerase IIA amplification or NQO1 polymorphisms and response. CONCLUSIONS: AMR and cyclophosphamide can be safely combined with little activity observed in heavily pretreated SCLC patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jalal et al. (2014) studied Advanced Solid Organ Malignancies and Relapsed Small Cell Lung Cancer (n=36). Amrubicin and Cyclophosphamide was evaluated on Maximum-tolerated dose and dose-limiting toxicities. The maximum-tolerated dose of amrubicin and cyclophosphamide was 30 mg/m2 and 500 mg/m2, respectively, with a 36.8% partial response rate in small cell lung cancer patients.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: