Key result
Dabigatran initiation in patients with atrial fibrillation was associated with significantly lower cardiology costs (OR 0.43; 95% CI 0.33-0.57) compared to acenocoumarol.
Why the study?
Does dabigatran reduce hospital and cardiology costs compared to acenocoumarol in patients with atrial fibrillation?
Cohort (n=766)
No
Does dabigatran reduce hospital and cardiology costs compared to acenocoumarol in patients with atrial fibrillation?
In patients with atrial fibrillation, initiation of dabigatran was associated with significantly lower cardiology and total hospital care costs compared to acenocoumarol.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May inform cost considerations in AF anticoagulant choice; leaves open confirmation versus acenocoumarol in randomized trials.
Aims: The prevalence of atrial fibrillation (AF) has increased over the past years due to aging of the population, and healthcare costs associated with AF reflect a significant financial burden. The aim of this study was to explore predictors for the real-world AF-related in-hospital costs in patients that recently initiated anticoagulation with acenocoumarol or dabigatran.Methods: Predictors for claimed total hospital care costs and cardiology costs in AF patients were explored by using hospital financial claims data from propensity score matched patient groups in a large Dutch community hospital. This study analyzed the total dataset (n = 766) and carried out a secondary analysis for all matched pairs of anticoagulation naïve AF patients (n = 590) by ordinal regression.Results: Dabigatran was a predictor for significantly lower cardiology and total hospital care costs (Odds Ratio [OR] = 0.43, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.33–0.57; and OR = 0.60, 95% CI = 0.46–0.79, respectively). Female gender was a predictor for lower total hospital care costs. Predictors for an increase in total hospital care costs were the occurrence of stroke or systemic embolism, major bleeding, and minor bleeding. The costs predictors were comparable when limiting the analysis to patients that were anticoagulation naïve. Age and CHA2DS2-VASc were not predictors for either cardiology or total hospital care costs in both analyses.Conclusion: Dabigatran treatment was as a predictor for lower cardiology costs and lower total hospital care costs in AF patients that initiated oral anticoagulation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jacobs et al. (2017) conducted a cohort in Atrial fibrillation (n=766). Dabigatran vs. Acenocoumarol was evaluated on Cardiology costs (OR 0.43, 95% CI 0.33-0.57). Dabigatran initiation in patients with atrial fibrillation was associated with significantly lower cardiology costs (OR 0.43; 95% CI 0.33-0.57) compared to acenocoumarol.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: