Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
OBJECTIVES: F-Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) has been an important modality for detecting malignancies. Recently, an increasing number of studies reported the utility of FDG-PET parameters in predicting clinical outcomes and treatment assessment in variety of cancers. We aimed at clarifying both the prognostic role and assessment value of FDG-PET in pancreatic carcinoma. METHODS: We systematically searched electronic databases of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science to identify relevant studies to conduct this meta-analysis. Comparative analyses of the pooled hazard ratio (HR) for overall survival were performed to assess the utility of FDG-PET parameters in prognosis evaluation and treatment assessment by random-effect model. RESULTS: Twenty-three studies with 1762 patients met the inclusion criteria of this meta-analysis. The pooled results revealed that greater maximum standardized uptake value of the primary tumor was significantly correlated with poorer overall survival (HR, 1.31; 95% confidence interval, 1.15-1.50; P < 0.001). Besides, greater reduction of maximum standardized uptake value after treatments indicated significant better overall survival (HR, 0.68; 95% confidence interval, 0.47-0.98; P = 0.037). CONCLUSIONS: F-Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography parameters might be helpful not only for predicting survival outcome but also for selecting potentially efficacious treatments in patients with pancreatic carcinoma.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: