Key result
Higher NT-proBNP plasma levels independently predicted a new cancer diagnosis within the first three years of follow-up in patients with stable coronary artery disease.
Why the study?
NT-proBNP plasma levels are increased in cancer patients, but whether NT-proBNP can identify patients who will receive a future cancer diagnosis in intermediate-term follow-up was unknown.
Do elevated NT-proBNP plasma levels predict new cancer diagnosis in patients with stable coronary artery disease?
Cohort (n=962)
Yes
Do elevated NT-proBNP plasma levels predict new cancer diagnosis in patients with stable coronary artery disease?
In patients with stable coronary artery disease, elevated NT-proBNP levels independently predict a new cancer diagnosis within the first three years of follow-up, potentially indicating subclinical malignancy.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Elevated NT-proBNP may flag early cancer risk in stable CAD; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change practice.
N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) plasma levels are increased in patients with cancer. In this paper, we test whether NT-proBNP may identify patients who are going to receive a future cancer diagnosis (CD) in the intermediate-term follow-up. We studied 962 patients with stable coronary artery disease and free of cancer and heart failure at baseline. This sample represents a re-analysis of a previous work expanding the sample size and the follow-up. NT-proBNP, galectin-3, monocyte chemoattractant protein-1, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I (hsTnI), and calcidiol (vitamin D) plasma levels were assessed. The primary outcome was new CD. After 5.40 (2.81–6.94) years of follow-up, 59 patients received a CD. NT-proBNP [HR 1.036 CI (1.015–1.056) per increase in 100 pg/mL; p = 0.001], previous atrial fibrillation (HR 3.140 CI (1.196–8.243); p = 0.020), and absence of previous heart failure (HR 0.067 CI (0.006–0.802); p = 0.033) were independent predictors of receiving a CD in the first three years of follow-up. None of the variables analyzed predicted a CD beyond this time. The number of patients developing heart failure during follow-up was 0 (0.0%) in patients receiving CD in the first three years of follow-up, 2 (6.9%) in those receiving a CD diagnosis beyond this time, and 40 (4.4%) in patients not developing cancer (p = 0.216). These numbers suggest that future heart failure was not a confounding factor. In patients with coronary artery disease, NT-proBNP was an independent predictor of CD in the first three years of follow-up but not later, suggesting that it could be detecting subclinical undiagnosed cancers.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tuñón et al. (2021) conducted a cohort in Stable coronary artery disease (n=962). NT-proBNP plasma levels vs. Lower NT-proBNP levels was evaluated on New cancer diagnosis in the first three years of follow-up (HR 1.036, 95% CI 1.015-1.056, p=0.001). Higher NT-proBNP plasma levels independently predicted a new cancer diagnosis within the first three years of follow-up in patients with stable coronary artery disease.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: