Key result
Stroke survivors exhibited significantly higher pdBSI and lower GC in frontal and parietal lobes during standing and perturbation tasks compared to healthy controls.
Why the study?
It was unclear whether different balance tasks affect balance assessment, particularly regarding the relationship between task difficulty and cortical responses involved in balance control after stroke.
Do different challenge-level balance tasks affect EEG-derived cortical responses (pdBSI and GC) in stroke survivors compared to healthy controls?
Observational (n=31)
Do different challenge-level balance tasks affect EEG-derived cortical responses (pdBSI and GC) in stroke survivors compared to healthy controls?
p-value: p=<0.001
EEG-derived pdBSI and GC during standing and perturbation tasks can serve as biomarkers for balance assessment in stroke survivors.
EEG metrics may support balance assessment in stroke; hypothesis-generating, requiring prospective validation before clinical use.
Previous studies have validated that different balance tasks induce different cortical responses, which are key indexes of balance assessment. Assessing balance is crucial for stroke survivors to prevent falls and improve rehabilitation outcomes. However, it was unclear whether these tasks may affect the balance assessment, particularly regarding the relationship between task difficulty and the corresponding cortical responses involved in balance control. Therefore, we sought to explore the effects of different challenge-level balance tasks on balance assessment. Eighteen participants with stroke and thirteen healthy individuals were recruited in this study. The EEG was collected during sitting, standing and perturbation tasks. The pairwise-derived Brain Symmetry Index (pdBSI), and Granger Causality (GC) were analyzed with a two-way (task ×group) RMANOVA. Finally, a multiple linear regression analysis was applied to predict the BBS score with the above parameters. We found a significant interaction effect on pdBSI and GC. In the frontal lobe, participants with stroke exhibited significantly higher pdBSI (standing: p=0.042, perturbation: p=0.013) and lower GC (standing: p<0.001, perturbation: p=0.028) compared to healthy controls. Similarly, in the parietal lobe, stroke survivors showed markedly higher pdBSI (standing: p = 0.006, perturbation: p=0.012) and lower GC (standing: p=0.030, perturbation: p=0.011). Finally, The Berg Balance Scale (BBS) scores could be reliably predicted using parietal BSI and frontal GC metrics recorded during standing (p<0.001, adjusted R²=0.938) and perturbation tasks (p=0.001, adjusted R²=0.644). It was discovered that the more challenging balance tasks better revealed the difference in the power distribution and the directional functional connection between groups. The pdBSI and GC during standing and perturbation tasks, could be used as biomarkers for stroke balance assessment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Xu et al. (2025) conducted an observational in Stroke (n=31). Stroke vs. Healthy individuals was evaluated on pairwise-derived Brain Symmetry Index (pdBSI) and Granger Causality (GC) (p=<0.001). Stroke survivors exhibited significantly higher pdBSI and lower GC in frontal and parietal lobes during standing and perturbation tasks compared to healthy controls.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: