Lacking of detail data, forest carbon stock estimation with forest inventory data usually excludes or underestimates understory carbon storage. To quantify the effects of understory on carbon sequestration in a natural secondary Pinus tabulaeformis forest, organ biomass models for arbor, shrub to their growth indices were regressed. Biomass of herbage was estimated in a stratified sampling method. Soil respiration in forest land was measured. Based on above data, carbon budget of Pinus tabulaeformis forest was assessed as 1.882 CO 2 Mghm −2 year −1 , 37.04% of the entire vegetation’s yearly net carbon storage belonging to understory.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hou et al. (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: