Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We exploit China’s 2018 Supply Chain Innovation and Application Pilot Program as a quasi-natural experiment to evaluate how supply chain digitalization shapes firm-level export competitiveness amidst rising global volatility. Using a difference-in-differences framework spanning 2010–2023, validated by a battery of robustness checks, we document a substantial export-promoting effect of policy-driven digital upgrading. This strategic advantage is structurally mediated through substantive innovation, equipping firms with core technological breakthroughs rather than mere operational efficiencies. Furthermore, we uncover a distinct asymmetry in risk mitigation: digitalization serves as an adaptive buffer against systemic industry-level shocks, yet it fails to mitigate idiosyncratic firm-level volatility. Finally, although positive spatial and industrial spillovers exist, the direct policy benefits remain overwhelmingly dominant and highly asymmetric, accruing predominantly to large, non-manufacturing, and digitally mature enterprises. These findings highlight a binding resource constraint, underscoring that supply chain digitalization functions as a contingent dynamic capability rather than a ubiquitous, universally accessible technological fix.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shao et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: