Key result
The HEART score was more effective than the TIMI score in predicting the need for hospitalization (AUC 0.807 vs 0.742) in emergency department patients with chest pain.
Why the study?
Inconclusive chest pain presentations complicate diagnostic processes and burden emergency departments, prompting an evaluation of factors influencing decisions to hospitalize versus discharge.
Does the HEART score improve prediction of hospitalization compared to the TIMI score in patients presenting to the emergency department with chest pain?
Cohort (n=330)
Does the HEART score improve prediction of hospitalization compared to the TIMI score in patients presenting to the emergency department with chest pain?
The HEART score outperforms the TIMI score for risk assessment and predicting the need for hospitalization in emergency department patients with chest pain.
Certain symptoms and comorbidities were associated with hospitalization decisions; leaves open whether incorporating them refines ED triage or reduces admissions.
BACKGROUND: Chest pain is one of the most common reasons for emergency department (ED) visits. Patients presenting with inconclusive symptoms complicate the diagnostic process and add to the burden upon the ED. This study aimed to determine factors possibly influencing ED decisions on hospitalization versus discharge for patients with the diagnosis of chest pain. METHODS: In the cohort study including 400 patients admitted to the emergency unit with a working diagnosis of chest pain, data on demographics, medical history, symptoms, lab results, and risk scores were collected from the medical records of patients admitted to the ED with a working diagnosis of chest pain. To reduce potential bias, the analysis was restricted to 330 patients who were referred to the ED by a primary care provider or clinic for chest pain. RESULTS: < 0.001). A higher proportion of hospitalizations occurred during the late-night shift. Significant predictors of hospitalization included hyperlipidemia (OR 3.246), diaphoresis (OR 8.525), dyspnea (OR 2.897), and hypertension (OR 1.959). Nursing home residents had a lower risk of hospitalization (OR 0.381). The area under the ROC curve for this model was 0.801 (95% CI: 0.753-0.848), indicating the predictive accuracy of the model in estimating the probability of admission. The HEART (history, ECG, age, risk factors, and troponin level) score was more effective than the TIMI (Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction) score in predicting the need for hospitalization, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.807 compared to 0.742 for TIMI. CONCLUSIONS: The HEART score in comparison with TIMI score proved especially valuable for quick risk assessment for hospitalization. The model that included hyperlipidemia, diaphoresis, dyspnea, and hypertension was the most predictive for the risk of hospitalization. Further research with larger populations is needed to validate these findings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kagansky et al. (2024) conducted a cohort in Chest pain (n=330). HEART score vs. TIMI score was evaluated on Hospitalization. The HEART score was more effective than the TIMI score in predicting the need for hospitalization (AUC 0.807 vs 0.742) in emergency department patients with chest pain.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: